June 2006 - Posts

DEATH
(Sorry, but no pictures this time. Blogger is having a problem with it's upload software.)

Illness is a part of life's overall plan. Just as ‘up’ is a necessity to ‘down’ and ‘in’ is a necessity to ‘out’, so too is illness a necessity to health. It is complementary and a part of the duality of this reality. Cure one disease and up pops another. Cure TB and an epidemic of asthma appears. Close the door to smallpox and in walks AIDS. Wipe out polio, and on the saliva of a deer tick dances in Lyme disease. Because disease is part of our belief system we should not stop our fight against it. But, we should also try to understand its purpose. Science tells us the purpose of a virus is to replicate itself, nothing more, and the purpose of our immune system is to keep it from doing so, nothing more. Science tells us that hostility is inbred in nature, that it is the survival of the fittest. Seth and Elias claim we do not ‘catch’ a virus. They state that all viruses can be found in the body and that the subjective and objective self triggers their replication.

Seth teaches that all matter is conscious and despite theories to the contrary, all things, animate and inanimate, depend upon inborn cooperation. It is cooperation, not survival of the fittest that governs all of nature. “Each organism has a purpose, and it is to fulfil its own capabilities in such a way that it benefits all other organisms.” This mirrors perennial philosophical thinking. There are many ways we benefit and not all of it do we judge as good. When a virus multiplies unchecked in our bodies it is because it has been invited to do so by one or more of our beliefs as a means of communication and/or experience, and not because it has an insatiable need to reproduce at all costs. It is important to remember that death is merely a change of focus in consciousness if we are to get to a point where we can believe that matter is conscious and cooperative. If we believe that this shining point of focus we call life is all that there is then we will go kicking and screaming into the darkness. But, if we trust that life is eternal and that it is we who choose our departure time, then we can look upon disease states and death with different eyes. Nothing is as sure as death and taxes. We prepare for taxes, but run from death our entire lives.

Consciousness does not experience death as a failure, whether it comes early or late, by expectation or not. Consciousness is eternal and, as such, unexpected or early death is seen as another experience that only went so far. Those that are left behind do not see it that way because of our belief system, but for those that die, the realization eventually occurs. Death is not an end, but simply a new beginning, and it always has its purpose.

Consider this story as an example of a widening awareness that death can bring. Jacob Thrimble is close to death. He is sixty years old and his family is gathered around his deathbed to pay their final respects to a husband and father who, according to their beliefs, is leaving them too soon. It is obvious to his wife and only son that Jacob wants to tell them something, and so they draw close to his lips.
“I never did enough,” Jacob whispers through dry and cracked lips.
“Nonsense,” his wife cries. She reminds him of all the sacrifices he made for her; how he bought her the beautiful fur coat she had always wanted with the money he was saving for a badly needed new farm tractor.
“No,” Jacob whispered. “I never did enough.”
This time his son answered. “You did more than anyone could ask of a father,” he said. “You gave up golf and fishing and all the things you love and took on an extra job to put me through college. No one could ask more of a father. You did more than enough.”
Jacob Thrimble opened his eyes and took them both in for the last time. On his final breath came these words. “No,” he said. “I never did enough for myself.”

The insight only came at the moment of death. It was death’s gift to Jacob Thrimble, or more accurately, Jacob’s gift to himself. There are many who lose the fight to death at an earlier than expected age, but if we allow it, we can find the victory in an apparent defeat. Those of us that are left behind feel cheated by death. It has robbed us of a loved one and we believe it has cut short our beloved's life. This is what we believe, and it is that belief that saddens us so deeply at our apparent loss. It’s not what happens within consciousness, but it is what we believe happens and so we experience it. Where is this afterlife religion says exists, but our scientists cannot find? Science says, “show me or I won’t believe it,” while religion says, “you must have faith.” We are caught between a rock and a hard place.

I was eighteen when the women’s movement began. I was brought up to respect women, to open doors for them, to take care of them, and to light their cigarettes. “Ladies before gentlemen” was the catch phrase, even unto death, before the women's movement began in the early sixties. The early battle between feminism and chauvinism left me confused, just as the battle between religion and science has us confused. I felt as though I was damned if I did and damned if I did not. If I opened the car door for my date, was I a male chauvinist pig trying to keep women subjugated and inferior, or was I a gentleman following the rules of courtesy as I was taught? It is a little like that with science and religion. We see the benefits science has brought us, but the idea itself has cut us off from our essential selves. That science cannot prove the existence of simultaneous realities, or that consciousness can exist apart from the body, does not mean we cannot believe in it until we experience it. The more of us that believe the more the proof will appear. Prophets and sages have experienced detached consciousness, and written about it throughout the ages and we did believe it, once. Many knew time was relative long before Einstein proved it. We gotta get out of this place some time and death will lose its sting when we understand that death is not an end, but a new beginning.

If we are to prepare for death as we prepare for taxes we must begin to understand what death is about. What is most important is this very moment of this very real life that we are presently living. It is in this moment that eternity exists. The present moment is our point of power. It is through an understanding of who we really are in the grandest sense that an understanding of death will become clear. We have believed for too long that if we don't get ‘it’ here, we’ll get ‘it’ there, that if we don't feel ‘it’ here, we’ll feel ‘it’ there. We don't know what ‘there’ is, but we do have some understanding of the ‘here.’ Our concept of the place called heaven has kept us from being fully present in the place called ‘here’. This ‘here’ and this ‘now’ that we find ourselves in, is all we’ve got, and if we don’t make the most of it because we think we’ll get it ‘there’ we are cheating ourselves. To await my heaven, while ignoring what is at hand is like the Sad Sack who does nothing to change his life, and proclaims to all who will listen, how life would be so much better if only he could pick the right six numbers on his State’s lottery.

Our belief in the afterlife is as simplistic as our understanding of God. Death is not an end; it merely marks a new beginning in terms of how we view the forward march of time. GC Jung in The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche says:

“We are so convinced that death is simply the end of a process that it does not ordinarily occur to us to conceive of death as a goal and a fulfilment, as we do without hesitation the aims and purposes of youthful life in its ascendance.”

Death is an end and a beginning for consciousness, just as birth is an end and a beginning.
Bill Marshall

Check out The Forgotten Self, US or UK. It's a fictional account of a global shift in consciousness.
The TV Analogy
To believe that consciousness is created by matter, which is the predominant belief today, is akin to saying that a TV set is the primal cause of the images it displays. This is what we believe about the brain. If an alien made an appearance on our planet and saw a TV program he might believe that the set was producing the image. If he cut a wire he might lose a few channels, thereby confirming his belief. If he breaks the screen he would be further supported by his supposition. We know that the TV is merely a conduit for the images produced elsewhere, but when it comes to the brain we switch gears and go to thinking similar to that of the alien. In Jane Roberts/Seth’s 1981 book, The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events, Seth used a beautiful Television analogy regarding the nature of consciousness and the events we experience in this physical reality. I wish to share it with you here. As Ed McMahon might say, “Heeeeere’s Sethy.”

“I have used television as an analogy at various times, and I would like to do so again, to show the ways in which physical events are formed, and to try to describe the many methods used by individuals in choosing those particular events that will be personally encountered.

“Not only does television serve as a mass means of communal meditation, but it also presents you with highly detailed, manufactured dreams, in which each viewer shares to some extent. We will use some distinctions here, and so I am going to introduce the terms “Framework 1” and “Framework 2,” to make my discussion clear. (Elias= Regional Area 1 and Regional Area 2)

“We will call the world as you physically experience it, Framework 1. In Framework 1, you watch television programs, for example. You have your choice of many channels. You have favorite programs. You follow certain scenes or actors. You watch all of these dramas, hardly understanding how it is that they appear on your screen to begin with. You are certain, however, that if you do buy a television set it will perform in an adequate fashion, whether or not you are familiar with electronics.

“You switch from channel to channel with predictable results. The programming for channel 9, for example, does not suddenly intrude on Channel 6. Even the actors themselves, taking part in such sagas, have but the remotest idea of events that are involved in order that their own images will appear on your television screen. Their jobs are to act, taking it for granted that the technicians are following through.

“Now somewhere there is a program director, who must take care of the entire programming. Shows must be done on time; actors assigned their roles. Our hypothetical director will know which actors are free, which actors prefer character roles, which ones are heroes or heroines, and which smiling Don Juan always gets the girl – and in general who plays the good guys and the bad guys,.

“There is no need in my outlining in detail the multitudinous events that must occur so that you can watch your favorite program. You flip the switch and there it is, while all of that background work is unknown to you. You take it for granted. Your job is simply to choose the programs of your choice on any evening. Many others are watching the same programs, of course, yet each person will react quite individually.

“Now for a moment let us imagine that physical events occur in the same fashion – that you choose which (ones) flash upon the screen of your experience. You are quite familiar with the events of your own life, for you are, of course, your own main hero or heroine, villain or victim, or whatever. As you do not know what happens in the television studio before you observe a program, however, so you do not know what happens in the creative framework of reality before you experience physical events. We will call that vast “unconscious” mental and universal studio Framework 2.

“…..You can turn off a program that offends you. You can choose to buy or not buy a product whose virtues are being praised. Television presents you with a mirror to your society. It reflects and re-reflects through millions of homes the giant dreams and fears, the hopes and terrors of events in the most private individual.

“Television interacts with your lives, but it does not cause your lives. It does not cause the events that it depicts. With your great belief in technology, it often seems to many people that television creates violence, for example, or that it causes a love of over-materialism, or that it causes “loose morals.” Television reflects. In a manner of speaking it does not even distort, though it may reflect distortions. The writers and actors of television dramas are attuned to the “mass mind.” They are not leaders or followers. They are creative reflectors, acutely aware of the overall, generalized emotional and psychic patterns of the age.

“They also make choices as to which plays they will take part in. Each has his or her own favorite kind of role, even if the role be that of a maverick. To the actors, of course, their roles become strong parts of their personal experiences, while those who observe the plays take part largely as observers.

“You are aware through your newspapers and magazines of the dramas, news broadcasts, or other programs that are presently being offered. In the same way you are aware, generally speaking, of the “programs” being physically presented in your own nation and throughout the world. You decide which of these adventures you want to take part in – and those you will experience in normal life, or in Framework 1.

“The inner mechanisms that happen prior to your experience will take place in the vast mental studio of Framework 2. Here, all the details will be arranged, the seemingly chance encounters, for example, the unexplained coincidences that might have to occur before a physical event takes place.

“On a conscious level, and with your conscious reserves alone, you could not keep your body alive an hour. You would not know how to do it, for your life flows through you automatically and spontaneously. You take the details for granted – the breathing, the inner mechanisms of nourishment and elimination, the circulation, and the maintenance of your psychological continuity. All of that is taken care of for you in what I have termed Framework 2.

“In that regard, certainly, everything works to your advantage. Indeed, often the more concerned you become with your body the less smoothly it functions. In the spontaneity of your body’s operation there is obviously a fine sense of order. When you turn on a television set the picture seems to come out of nowhere onto the screen – yet that picture is the result of order precisely focused.

“Actors visit casting agencies so that they know what plays need their services. In your dreams you visit “casting agencies.” You are aware of the various plays being considered for physical production. In the dream state, then, often you familiarize yourself with dramas that are of a probable nature. If enough interest is shown, if enough actors apply, if enough resources are accumulated, the play will go on. When you are in other than your normally conscious state, you visit that creative inner agency in which all physical productions must have their beginning. You meet with others, who for their own reasons are interested in the same kind of drama. Following our analogy, the technicians, the actors, the writers all assemble – only in this case the result will be a live event rather than a televised one. There are disaster films being planned, educational programs, religious drams. All of these will be encountered in full-blown physical reality.

“Such events occur as a result of individual beliefs, desires, and intents. There is no such thing as a chance encounter. No death occurs by chance, nor any birth. In the creative atmosphere of Framework 2, intents are known. In a manner of speaking, no act is private. Your communication systems bring to your living room notices of events that occur throughout the world. Yet that larger inner system of communications is far more powerful in scope, and each mental act is imprinted in the multidimensional screen of Framework 2. That screen is available to all, and in other levels of consciousness, particularly in the sleep and dreaming stages, the events of that inner reality are as ever-present and easily accessible as physical events are when you are awake.

“It is as if Framework 2 contains an infinite information service, that instantly puts you in contact with whatever knowledge you require, that sets up circuits between you and others, that computes probabilities with blinding speed. Not with the impersonality of a computer, however, but with a loving intent that has your best purposes in mind – yours and also those of each other individual.

“You cannot gain what you want at someone else’s detriment, then. You cannot use Framework 2 to force an event upon another person. Certain prerequisites must be met, you see, before a desired end can become physically experienced.”

Bill Marshall

Check out my lastest book, The Forgotten Self, US and UK
Truth or Consequences

When we don’t know our own truths is when we suffer the consequences. Our truths are actually beliefs that are held as absolutes. They are so rock solid that we never question them as beliefs, but hold them tightly as facts and, therefore, truths. Cause and effect is a belief that we hold as a truth, and because we do so we assume there is no other way it can be perceived. This limits choice, and Essence abhors a lack of choice. I refer you to my blog, It’s a Fack, Jack, where I address our belief in facts. A fact is merely a belief we have turned into a truth, and therefore an absolute. When, on occasion, that truth is broken we give it a new name. Any guesses?…… We call a broken fact a miracle, as in the case of stigmata which I wrote about in a previous blog.

There is no expressed truth in beliefs, and yet we seek to find truth, but at the same time they are not true. This is the paradox. Here’s a simple example: I hate the taste of brussel spouts. This is a tiny truth for me, but I realize that many people love the taste of brussel sprouts. So, my distaste for brussel sprouts is true, but it is not truth. We can get our minds around this simple example. A more difficult truth to wrap our minds around is the truth of pain. For most of us pain is a truth, but the paradox, again, is that it is not true.

Luigi is working in the garage while keeping his eye on his four-year-old son who is riding his tricycle in the driveway. Luigi is building a workbench and whacks his thumb with the hammer. The pain is intense and his attention shifts immediately to the pain. Suddenly he hears screeching tires in the street and his attention shifts to the scene where his son is inches from the front bumper of an SUV. His attention has shifted from his thumb to his frightened and crying son. He runs down the driveway and scoops up his unhurt son, completely oblivious to the pain that only a moment earlier was the center of his world. The pain is gone. Once his son is .securely back in the house and comforted Luigi’s attention shifts back to his thumb and his belief in pain. His thumb begins to throb again.

This is an example of a belief held in the absolute (hit your thumb with a hammer and it’s going to hurt). Pain is a belief that is greatly influenced by the far larger belief in cause and effect. It is Luigi’s truth (probably yours also), but it is not true. The evidence is the complete cessation of the pain between the screeching tires and the comforting of his son. During this time his attention and, therefore, his focus on a belief (pain) had shifted.

The belief system of truth is the most difficult to identify and notice because we never question what we believe to be true. We respond automatically and without question. Luigi never questioned that he had another choice when he hit his thumb with the hammer. His response was automatic and unquestioned, and yet for a period of time he was totally without pain and didn’t notice that his belief in pain during that time was not true. We all have numerous beliefs that go unnoticed, and when we don’t notice we can’t question that there may be another way to respond; another choice.

There is nothing wrong with our truths. They align with our Intent and Value Fulfillment, but in holding them without awareness we become non-accepting of differences. This non-acceptance is what causes conflict. We will draw to ourselves that which we do not accept so that we may view the mirror action or the reflection. The typical response in any conflict, either individual or global, is that I/we are right and you/they are wrong.

There are truths, but they are not what we typically think of as truths. “Real” truths are those that are translatable within every area of consciousness and through all dimensions and all realities. Ours is but one of numberless realities. Truths are not associated with concepts. Truths are associated with action, for consciousness is action. Consciousness is a truth. Reality is a truth. Choice is a truth. Color is a truth. Tone is a truth and love is a truth. Remember, the new definition of love is knowing (that we are all Essence) and appreciation (of what each of us creates). Spanking-your-child-is-bad is not a truth. It is a belief. Truths are not things. Things are abstract translations of inner subjective states. The truths that I am addressing in this blog are our truths that are associated with our beliefs.

We typically draw others to us whose truths are similar to our own. If you are a neo-nazi you are not going to be hanging out with Jews. Conversely, Jews are not going to have neo-nazis as members of their synagogue. Most of us would agree that our preference is for a harmonious life, free of hatred and racism, but there are those, such as the neo-nazis, who consider us weak and non-protective of family and country. Each of these two groups embodies different truths that are not true, but are reality. Remember, reality is a truth, but the things of reality are not.

In session 1799 of the Elias Transcripts, Elias says: “It is not a matter of altering other individuals. It is a matter of you engaging your creativity to discover a manner in which you can generate cooperation with other individuals in which you are not compromising you, but you are also not discounting or opposing the other individual. Let me express to you, if you are not expressing an opposing energy to another individual, whether you dislike them or disagree with them, the other individual shall not project an opposing energy to you either, which neutralizes the conflict.”

We will continue in our preferences of good/bad, right/wrong for they align with our individual Intents. What needs to change and what is in the process of changing is not applying our own individual truths to everyone else. This is where the acceptance of differences comes into play. You don’t have to agree with someone who holds opposing truths, nor is it necessary for you to try to sway them to your truth, for this is the action of non-acceptance. It is not necessary to agree in order to cooperate, for all individual truths are true, but only for the individual.
Bill Marshall

P.S. Please take a look at my book, The Forgotten Self, either in the US or the UK.