August 2006 - Posts

OPTIMISM
We are gradually hypnotizing ourselves into a state of chronic pessimism and fear, but in so doing we are placing our beliefs before us in such stark fashion they are becoming impossible to ignore. Everywhere we turn we see victims. An avalanche of terrorism, natural disasters, viruses and allergens is burying optimism. Our children no longer climb maple trees nor skip down the neighbourhood sidewalk unwatched. Like a slow creeping hearing loss that goes unnoticed until its teeth are deeply sunk into the cochlea we are slowly but surely becoming a race of defenders. Life has become less an experience than an enemy to be guarded against. Our media bombards us with the evidence that life is dangerous. But, there is a purpose to it all and we are its creators. We create it to bring our beliefs into stark relief.

Our natural birthright is optimism, but it is secondary to free will. Perception is not a receiver of reality. Perception is the projector of it. Perception, moulded by our beliefs, projects outwardly in physical form abstract representations of our inner states of being. More and more we are coming to believe in victimhood, and so perception projects the belief outward in physical form so that we can see it. I want to make a case for optimism, for it is easier to create in joy and pleasure than it is to create in trauma, conflict and suffering.

Pessimists call optimists Pollyannas. Considering what we are taught about the nature of reality the wonder is not that there are pessimists, but that any of us remain optimists. How any of us stay optimistic about life has to be one of the great mysteries of the past four centuries. We have done a bang-up job through science and religion of making pessimists out of the lot of us. For the evidence we merely need check the sales records for drugs such as Zoloft, Prozac and Xanax. Depression is rampant, and when you are depressed you concentrate almost exclusively on misery. It’s a vicious cycle. Pessimism creates depression, which creates even more pessimistic thoughts, which continues to create the evidence that your belief in pessimism is well warranted. Religion aids and abets pessimism because it tells us that our reward is not in the moment, but in the hereafter, and so we are rarely present in the moment. Religion as currently understood robs us of our innate optimism and like a crowbar it pries us out of the present.

For most of us Baptism is our first religious rite. If only Adam hadn't taken that bite of the apple from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. In telling this story to children the problem lies in that they are not sophisticated enough to realize it is metaphoric of our fall into a world of seeming duality, not of sin. The word ‘fall’ suggests a descent from a loftier place. It establishes hierarchy and an understanding that we are spoiled goods. We all come into this world with the sins of our fathers, the dogma goes. Our parents tell us they love us and cherish us, but the big message is that we came with a problem. The story of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from the Garden of Eden is the first blow to our innate sense of optimism. It is the first blow to our self-esteem. As the Woody Harrelson movie tells us, we are “Natural Born Killers,” and we must guard against its expression all our lives.

Trouble continues to dog us after Baptism. We are taught God loves us, but then we’re hit with a contradiction the size of Great Britain. Yes, God loves us, but if we sin we will burn in hell for all eternity. Whatever happened to unconditional love? For those of you that believe that unconditional love is a goal of life why create a concept of God that portrays just the opposite? This contradiction worked its way into our collective psyche like a screw worm works its way into driftwood. To maintain the feeling of ‘We-ness’ and that we are an individual manifestation of an aspect of God is not easy under such a barrage. Pessimism grows. This is but one small facet in the creation of our belief systems. We learned that we are so bad and God’s love for us so great that only a sacrifice so large as the crucifixion of his ‘only son’ could redeem us. Not a good picture for building self-esteem, but great for perpetuating guilt. The historical Jesus sees through much of the veil we have pulled over our eyes and says, ‘I and the Father are one.’ What do we do with Jesus' startling and potentially transforming information? We assign divinity to him alone. God stayed up there, and we remained stuck down here.

The Jesus Seminar came about in 1985 when scholars, led by the late Robert W. Funk, decided to do something about the inconsistencies among some of the words attributed to Jesus in the four gospels of the New Testament. Over the past twenty years more than one hundred scholars from around the world have participated in this semi-annual meeting. There is a thought process, a timber, a resonance that attaches itself to the nature of a human being. If I consistently write of love, peace and understanding and live those words outwardly in my life, people get a sense of who I am and what I am about. The Jesus Seminar came together to find what Jesus may have actually said in the midst of all that which Matthew, John, Mark and Luke wrote that he said. How is the Jesus Seminar important to our understanding of optimism and pessimism? If a case is to be made for optimism then it must have the ring of truth. In Matthew, chapter 6 verses 25-34 Jesus tells us about the universe being well disposed towards us. I will let Jesus' words speak for themselves.

Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what you shall eat, or what you shall drink; nor yet for your body, what you shall put on. Is not life more than meat, and the body more than raiment?
Behold the fowls in the air: for they sow not, nor do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much better than they?
Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature?
And why take you thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
And yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith?
Therefore take no thought, saying, what shall we eat? Or, what shall we drink? Or, in wherewithal shall we be clothed?
(For after all these things to do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knows that you have need of all these things.
But seek you first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.


Jesus’ words challenge us to live a life based on optimism and trust. Seth and Elias tell us that we get what we concentrate upon and concentration is based on our beliefs and not on thought. If we concentrate on fear, we will give ourselves the evidence that our belief in fear is appropriate. If we believe the world is populated by thieves we better lock our doors and nail down our valuables because we’re going to meet a thief or two. Being responsible for ourselves is an idea that in itself creates fear in many of us. We like order and rules that map out our course.

Jesus tells us that the way to salvation is through a narrow gate and that few will take it. Many will remain on the wide road. John Sanford in The Kingdom Within says the wide way is the way of mass identity. Individuality is fearful to many that have developed the habit of always comparing themselves to others. Conscious awareness requires an acceptance (non-judgment) of differences.

Jesus’ words have layer upon layer of meaning. Sanford, an Episcopalian priest and Jungian therapist, sees Jesus as challenging us to become conscious. But, like an onion, Jesus’ words have yet more layers of meaning. The narrow gate or constricted passage can also mean the way of self responsibility. The wide way, that of blaming chance, others, or unseen forces for our plight has been our choice for thousands of years. If we become ill, how much easier is it to say, “I am a victim,” than to address the issue we have invited illness into our lives to communicate. If we are alcohol or drug dependent how much easier is it to say that we are genetically predisposed to addiction than it is to question why we have chosen addiction as a life path? What does our addiction have to say to us? It is not telling us we are bad. It is comparing ourselves to others that tell us either we or they are bad or we or they are good. Both are judgments.

The Buddha has said that if you find him along your path you should kill him. His meaning, of course, is that you are responsible for your own footfalls in life; he but shows the way to finding our own path. We have been exceptionally good at following the wide way. The religious dogma is that salvation can be won through a belief in Jesus. But how does that equate to a narrow gate? We have always found it easy to be followers. It is time we believe in ourselves.
Bill Marshall
Steve Hancock: In Memorium
Carl Jung, the father of Archetypal psychology said: “We are so convinced that death is simply the end of a process that it does not ordinarily occur to us to conceive of death as a goal and a fulfillment, as we do without hesitation the aims and purposes of youthful life in its ascendance.”

It is my greatest honor to give the eulogy for my best friend, Steve Hancock. But he was also tom's best friend and Dean's and others. But more importantly, when you were with Steve he made you feel as though you were HIS best friend. A few days before Steve left us, Brenda and Maureen Collins and I were sitting by his bed, while Steve danced between this world and the next and when he returned to this world his eyes would open and his beautiful smile spread across his face. That smile was the clue to what Steve was all about. On August 15, 2006 our beloved friend, Steve Hancock, left this life for a new adventure, leaving his family and friends with more gifts than we could possibly carry. My intent here is not to describe the gifts Steve left us with, we all individually know that, but rather the gifts his pancreatic cancer brought to him. I joined him on his three year journey with his disease possibly in a different way than others who were equally close to him.

Steve Hancock was many things, but to his closest friends he was pure sweetness, pure joy. Steve would allow Tom, Dean and myself into his central core, for he never needed a defense while with us. Stevie surrounded that core of pure unprocessed sweetness with a bravery, a strength, a loyalty, a sense of responsibility, a patriotism and a tenacity that most of us could only aspire to. Many saw his toughness and thought that it was his toughness that kept him in the battle for three years. And it did, but his toughness had a goal. That goal was to dig and dig until it revealed to Steve that core sweetness that drove everything else. As his cancer progressed and his body withered, Steve’s understanding of himself blossomed. He used to refer to himself as Mr. Defense, and traces of it remained, as when he’d squirt cologne into the full-on blower of his car’s air conditioner, forcing those riding with him to crank down the windows. But as his attention turned more and more toward himself he came finally to understand that there was nothing to defend against.

Steve’s cancer brought him physical limitations, which were difficult to witness for all of us that loved him, but again, as his physical powers diminished his self insight grew. Steve was not a big man, if one measures a man by his size, but Damn, was he strong. There was no one I’d rather have “taking my back” in a tough situation. It was difficult for him to acknowledge the loss of his strength and yet he was willing to accept it as long as what he called “The Inner Gifts” kept coming.

“Billy,” he said. “I know people wouldn’t understand this, but my cancer is the best thing that could have happened to me.” He paused for a moment and with that beautiful smile of his added, “Except for Brenda, of course.” God! How he loved Brenda. A few days before his death we argued about whether there was a song named Brenda. I later realized that Steve believed there was because to him Brenda was a song. We talked of death and for Steve it was not to be feared. What Steve feared most was how his family would fare without him. Responsibility was a strong belief in Steve; held as a truth above all others, even above loyalty and courage. They were his path markers throughout his life and they guided him well. What his cancer taught him, amongst many other things, is that his path markers were not necessarily everyone elses path markers.

He began to allow others their choices and as he did he drew to himself his own acknowledgment through the visible affection heaped upon him by friends and strangers alike. People came out of the woodwork to thank him for how he had touched their lives. The more he talked about these things the more Steve approached the realization that there was nothing about himself that was unacceptable. He grew more at peace even while his cancer ravaged his powerful body. The sugar, the furnace that fired him and drove all else, was making itself known to Steve Hancock.

People were drawn to Steve because he carried for them those aspects of themselves they feared to openly express. Steve could make you laugh when you thought you were ready to cry, and he loved to sing. Boy, did he love to sing. Nothing would keep him from breaking out in song. His favorite (next to The Star Spangled Banner) was “Only You” the 50’s classic, and he crooned it as beautifully to the 90 year old woman at the Manchester Turkey Day Race as he did to a group of 20 somethings at the Mohegan Sun. They giggled and wondered if Steve wanted to be paid. Tommy laughed and said, “Hell, ladies. He does it because he loves to see you smile.”

Steve wondered sometimes – as we all do – what people thought of him. “Billy," he once asked, “Do you think people only see me as a song and laugh man?” He needed to know that he mattered, that he made a difference. God, did he matter. But, I told him that what mattered most is what he thinks of himself. Steve Hancock left an indelible mark on all those who drew him into their lives; some for just the briefest of moments, and others like me and Dean and Tom, who needed so much more from him. Randy Collins, who Steve loved like a son, wears Steve's Saint Jude medal around his next as he fights for freedom as a marine in Iraq. Few understood the significance of that gesture. It brought Steve home safely from Vietnam nearly forty years ago.
Toward the end we shared what each of us carried for the other as though we were each one side of the same coin. This was something we didn’t or couldn’t do before cancer entered his life and mine and yours too.

Steve gravitated to battles, whether they be in Vietnam or a 26.2 mile race. You are the man, Steve, and WE thank you for the light you shined upon all of us.How beautifully typical that this Marine’s Marine would choose such a battle to get to his own golden sugar.

And so the sugar ROSE and ROSE until all one could see of Steve was pure sweetness. It outweighed his strength, which he carried to the end. It outweighed his sense of responsibility, which finally relinquished him so he could go. It outweighed his courage, which kept those who knew him in awe. But more than anything else, his sweetness- that was always known to everyone else – at last revealed itself to Steve. At death, Steven Hancock finally knew about himself what all of those he temporarily left behind had always known. Above all those things that our culture holds dear; things like courage, responsibility, loyalty Steve at his core was sweetness.

Now, at this point I thought I had finished Steve’s eulogy, written the day after he departed. I needed to run, as it is that space in which I find my own peace. I headed out my back door and into the woods and then into the Norwich industrial park. My head and heart was filled with Steve. As I passed Dodd Stadium I invited Steve along for the run, not by my side but as part of my own spirit, and as I asked, a wave of pure joy filled me and I gasped. It was not a gasp of sorrow, but rather a gasp of knowing joy. Steve was with me.

I ran further and felt a rush of pure thought that formed itself slowly into words. I know as surely as I know that I am standing here that it was Steve telling me something. His words came and filled my mind. They were meant for Steven, Michelle and Derrick. I realized then that I had left them out of Steve’s Eulogy and he was telling me what he wanted to say to them. These are his words that I felt on that run:

Dearest Steven, Michelle and Derrick,
I have left you a treasure chest full of me. There was a time when I felt it my responsibility to pick out of that chest for you. What I say to you now is this: Choose freely from my chest and use what suits your own natures, not mine. Some of what I have left you may serve you, some may not. I set you free to be who you are, and who you are I love oh so well.

That, my friends, is who Steve Hancock is. PURE SWEETNESS!



Now, try to bring Steve into focus, because if he could give his own eulogy this would be it.

by the Platters
Only you can make this world seem right
Only you can make the darkness bright
Only you and you alone
Can thrill me like you do
And fill my heart with love for only you

Only you can make this change in me
For it's true, you are my destiny
When you hold my hand
I understand the magic that you do
You're my dream come true
My one and only you

Only you can make this change in me
For it's true, you are my destiny
When you hold my hand
I understand the magic that you do
You're my dream come true
My one and only you
Steve Hancock: In Memorium
Carl Jung, the father of Archetypal psychology said: “We are so convinced that death is simply the end of a process that it does not ordinarily occur to us to conceive of death as a goal and a fulfillment, as we do without hesitation the aims and purposes of youthful life in its ascendance.”

It is my greatest honor to give the eulogy for my best friend, Steve Hancock. But he was also tom's best friend and Dean's and others. But more importantly, when you were with Steve he made you feel as though you were HIS best friend. A few days before Steve left us, Brenda and Maureen Collins and I were sitting by his bed, while Steve danced between this world and the next and when he returned to this world his eyes would open and his beautiful smile spread across his face. That smile was the clue to what Steve was all about. On August 15, 2006 our beloved friend, Steve Hancock, left this life for a new adventure, leaving his family and friends with more gifts than we could possibly carry. My intent here is not to describe the gifts Steve left us with, we all individually know that, but rather the gifts his pancreatic cancer brought to him. I joined him on his three year journey with his disease possibly in a different way than others who were equally close to him.

Steve Hancock was many things, but to his closest friends he was pure sweetness, pure joy. Steve would allow Tom, Dean and myself into his central core, for he never needed a defense while with us. Stevie surrounded that core of pure unprocessed sweetness with a bravery, a strength, a loyalty, a sense of responsibility, a patriotism and a tenacity that most of us could only aspire to. Many saw his toughness and thought that it was his toughness that kept him in the battle for three years. And it did, but his toughness had a goal. That goal was to dig and dig until it revealed to Steve that core sweetness that drove everything else. As his cancer progressed and his body withered, Steve’s understanding of himself blossomed. He used to refer to himself as Mr. Defense, and traces of it remained, as when he’d squirt cologne into the full-on blower of his car’s air conditioner, forcing those riding with him to crank down the windows. But as his attention turned more and more toward himself he came finally to understand that there was nothing to defend against.

Steve’s cancer brought him physical limitations, which were difficult to witness for all of us that loved him, but again, as his physical powers diminished his self insight grew. Steve was not a big man, if one measures a man by his size, but Damn, was he strong. There was no one I’d rather have “taking my back” in a tough situation. It was difficult for him to acknowledge the loss of his strength and yet he was willing to accept it as long as what he called “The Inner Gifts” kept coming.

“Billy,” he said. “I know people wouldn’t understand this, but my cancer is the best thing that could have happened to me.” He paused for a moment and with that beautiful smile of his added, “Except for Brenda, of course.” God! How he loved Brenda. A few days before his death we argued about whether there was a song named Brenda. I later realized that Steve believed there was because to him Brenda was a song. We talked of death and for Steve it was not to be feared. What Steve feared most was how his family would fare without him. Responsibility was a strong belief in Steve; held as a truth above all others, even above loyalty and courage. They were his path markers throughout his life and they guided him well. What his cancer taught him, amongst many other things, is that his path markers were not necessarily everyone elses path markers.

He began to allow others their choices and as he did he drew to himself his own acknowledgment through the visible affection heaped upon him by friends and strangers alike. People came out of the woodwork to thank him for how he had touched their lives. The more he talked about these things the more Steve approached the realization that there was nothing about himself that was unacceptable. He grew more at peace even while his cancer ravaged his powerful body. The sugar, the furnace that fired him and drove all else, was making itself known to Steve Hancock.

People were drawn to Steve because he carried for them those aspects of themselves they feared to openly express. Steve could make you laugh when you thought you were ready to cry, and he loved to sing. Boy, did he love to sing. Nothing would keep him from breaking out in song. His favorite (next to The Star Spangled Banner) was “Only You” the 50’s classic, and he crooned it as beautifully to the 90 year old woman at the Manchester Turkey Day Race as he did to a group of 20 somethings at the Mohegan Sun. They giggled and wondered if Steve wanted to be paid. Tommy laughed and said, “Hell, ladies. He does it because he loves to see you smile.”

Steve wondered sometimes – as we all do – what people thought of him. “Billy," he once asked, “Do you think people only see me as a song and laugh man?” He needed to know that he mattered, that he made a difference. God, did he matter. But, I told him that what mattered most is what he thinks of himself. Steve Hancock left an indelible mark on all those who drew him into their lives; some for just the briefest of moments, and others like me and Dean and Tom, who needed so much more from him. Randy Collins, who Steve loved like a son, wears Steve's Saint Jude medal around his next as he fights for freedom as a marine in Iraq. Few understood the significance of that gesture. It brought Steve home safely from Vietnam nearly forty years ago.
Toward the end we shared what each of us carried for the other as though we were each one side of the same coin. This was something we didn’t or couldn’t do before cancer entered his life and mine and yours too.

Steve gravitated to battles, whether they be in Vietnam or a 26.2 mile race. You are the man, Steve, and WE thank you for the light you shined upon all of us.How beautifully typical that this Marine’s Marine would choose such a battle to get to his own golden sugar.

And so the sugar ROSE and ROSE until all one could see of Steve was pure sweetness. It outweighed his strength, which he carried to the end. It outweighed his sense of responsibility, which finally relinquished him so he could go. It outweighed his courage, which kept those who knew him in awe. But more than anything else, his sweetness- that was always known to everyone else – at last revealed itself to Steve. At death, Steven Hancock finally knew about himself what all of those he temporarily left behind had always known. Above all those things that our culture holds dear; things like courage, responsibility, loyalty Steve at his core was sweetness.

Now, at this point I thought I had finished Steve’s eulogy, written the day after he departed. I needed to run, as it is that space in which I find my own peace. I headed out my back door and into the woods and then into the Norwich industrial park. My head and heart was filled with Steve. As I passed Dodd Stadium I invited Steve along for the run, not by my side but as part of my own spirit, and as I asked, a wave of pure joy filled me and I gasped. It was not a gasp of sorrow, but rather a gasp of knowing joy. Steve was with me.

I ran further and felt a rush of pure thought that formed itself slowly into words. I know as surely as I know that I am standing here that it was Steve telling me something. His words came and filled my mind. They were meant for Steven, Michelle and Derrick. I realized then that I had left them out of Steve’s Eulogy and he was telling me what he wanted to say to them. These are his words that I felt on that run:

Dearest Steven, Michelle and Derrick,
I have left you a treasure chest full of me. There was a time when I felt it my responsibility to pick out of that chest for you. What I say to you now is this: Choose freely from my chest and use what suits your own natures, not mine. Some of what I have left you may serve you, some may not. I set you free to be who you are, and who you are I love oh so well.

That, my friends, is who Steve Hancock is. PURE SWEETNESS!



Now, try to bring Steve into focus, because if he could give his own eulogy this would be it.

by the Platters
Only you can make this world seem right
Only you can make the darkness bright
Only you and you alone
Can thrill me like you do
And fill my heart with love for only you

Only you can make this change in me
For it's true, you are my destiny
When you hold my hand
I understand the magic that you do
You're my dream come true
My one and only you

Only you can make this change in me
For it's true, you are my destiny
When you hold my hand
I understand the magic that you do
You're my dream come true
My one and only you
DOGMA and SCIENCE

In Dreams, Evolution and Value Fulfillment, Volume 1 Seth says:

“Moreover, science's thesis meets with no answering affirmation in the human heart - and in fact arouses the deepest antipathy, for in his heart man well knows his own worth, and realizes that his own consciousness is no accident. The psyche, then, possesses within itself an inner affirmation, an affirmation that keeps man from being completely blinded by his own mental edifices.

“There is furthermore a deep, subjective, immaculately knowledgeable standard within man's consciousness by which he ultimately judges all of the theories and the beliefs of his time, and even if his intellect is momentarily swamped by ignoble doctrines, still that point of integrity within him is never fooled.”

Through my books and this blog I hope to arouse that part of us that is never fooled. So why pick on science? After all, science has brought us all those conveniences that have served to connect us, even though the underlying concept they use to produce those conveniences says that everything is a result of material forces. The bone I wish to pick with science is not with the idea of science, but with science’s dogmatic view that consciousness is a product of matter, specifically the brain. As long as science sticks to its dogma they will not progress significantly beyond their current road. Specifically, science has for years tried to develop a “Theory of Everything.” They are moving forward with string theory, but continue to be stymied by the instant of creation, that moment just before the big bang. When they try to look beyond that moment, all their formulations break down. Why?

DOGMA! Dogma is to science and religion as blinders are to a race horse. Blinders keep the horse’s attention focused straight ahead so that it cannot be distracted from what impinges on it from the side. Skeptics are those who are blinded by dogma and deny even their own experience that falls outside the boundaries of the dogma. The boldest venture outside those boundaries at their own peril. CG Jung wrote in Mysterium Coniunctionis : “The wise man who is not heeded is counted a fool, and the fool who proclaims the general folly first and loudest passes for a prophet and Fuhrer, and sometimes it is luckily the other way round as well, or else mankind would long since have perished of stupidity.” Jung was a wise man and dared to venture beyond the dogma of the time that said there is only a personal unconscious created only during a lifetime. It was Jung that coined the term, “The Collective Unconscious.” In 1919 Jung said: “I shall not commit the fashionable stupidity of regarding everything I can't explain as a fraud.”

In quantum physics it is said that the experimenter cannot be extracted from his experiment, which is to say in 21st Century Reality language, the experiment and the experimenter are one and the same. Dr. Marilyn Schlitz conducted studies to determine the effect of interested human observers on random number generators. She found a statistically significant effect. She then invited renowned skeptics to conduct the exact same experiment. They found no significant effect. Dr. Schlitz expected a significant result, which is to say that she believed that consciousness is not local to the brain and that action can occur without a material cause. The skeptics believe consciousness is created by the brain and that nothing happens without material cause. Now I can’t say whether Dr. Schlitz believes that we each create are own reality, but I can say that the Skeptics scoff at the idea.

If what this blog puts forward is accurate – that there is no THE REALITY and that we each create our individual realities – then Dr. Schlitz and the skeptics are both right. The results confirm their individual beliefs. Until they both understand this there will be conflicting results when testing the effects of consciousness. You get what you believe, not what you think you believe. We have fables that foretell change, and often it is the child that proclaims the folly of the old. The Emperor's New Clothes is such an admonition. In this fable no one dares tell the King he is naked, so everyone acknowledges how beautiful his new clothes are. To proclaim the Emperor's folly would be akin to breaking the dogma and removing the blinders from the race horse. Proclaim it, however, and we sail beyond a fixed horizon.

It took a child in the fable to open everyone's eyes, but in our age we don't listen to our children. We think we do, but we don’t. When we think we are listening we tell them the Emperor is not naked, but is wearing a splendid new suit of clothing. We are, like our own parents and parents of all time, entranced. We become unconscious hypnotists ourselves. Like us, our children grow up believing in Newton and Descartes, but not knowing it; believing in cause and effect to the exclusion of all else; believing that our true nature is base and must be held in check; believing that the world we live in is hostile and we are defenceless against predators, large and small. We are taught to believe that reality is defined by what we can hear, see, touch, taste, and smell, and that psyche is a product of matter. There is much that goes on in our world that does not fit our small snapshot of reality. Bob Dylan knew something when in 1964 he sang, “The times, they are a changin’”

Bill Marshall

Check out my books, The Forgotten Self (US) and (UK) and Gideon McGee’s Dream. For those Elias folks who haven’t purchased the book, a hint to what the story is about can be gained by counting the number of rose petals on the cover.