September 2006 - Posts

What? Me Worry!!
Remember Alfred E. Neuman from Mad Magazine? His famous words seem to have ingrained themselves into our collective psyches. In session 1393 Elias had this to say about worry:
ELIAS: Yes. Your attention is not present. And you project in association with the largest word, which is one of the smallest words, the “if.” What if, what if, what if. Once you begin to move into what if, what if, what if, your attention is occupied very much in the future, attempting to solve dilemmas that have not occurred, in anticipation of dilemmas which are not present and have not occurred.
Now; what are you creating and DOING in that action? In that projection, you are actually reinforcing an expression of energy outwardly to CREATE the dilemmas that you anticipate.


I think Alfred E. Neuman had an insight that we might consider incorporating ourselves, for as Elias has pointed out, worry throws us right out of the NOW and lands us on our collective asses in the future. And where is the future created? In the NOW. How can we create in the now if our attention is focused in the future? We can’t!

I’ve noticed, and you have also, that our news programs actually begin some of their segments with, “Should We Be Worried?” This morning (9/22/06) on the CBS morning show they had a bit on the “dangers” of not washing your hands often enough and then proceeded to demonstrate how to do it in a public place. First you get the paper towels and tuck them under your arm. By doing this you don’t have to touch the 'filth infested' dispenser with your clean hands after washing them. Of course they didn’t mention cleaning your dirty armpit before stuffing the paper towels there. Then you wash your hands vigorously for twenty seconds under hot water and avoid anti-bacterial soap. Anti-bacterial soap, we are told, can create drug resistant strains of bacteria. OK, you’re done washing your hands, but you don’t want to turn off the filth infested faucet with them because that would also defeat the purpose of washing in the first place. You bend over and somehow use your elbow to turn it off, or, grab the paper towel under your arm and use that.

Come on! As the Kit Kat candy commercial says, “Gimme a Break!” All of this gloom and doom reporting seems to be dividing us all into two camps. The first is the camp
of the fearful; those who live their lives in defense mode all the time. The second camp is comprised of those who have been so bombarded by all this victimization reporting that they have chosen not to believe any of it. I remember seeing a report on the harmful effects of milk. Eureka!!!! Milk?

The first camp has been slowly withdrawing from life, while the second camp, tired of feeling the victim of everything in their environment, has finally begun to engage life. The first camp has become the collective “Bubble Boy” of Seinfeld fame, while the second camp dances freely around the first camp. The first camp, of course, thinks the members of the second camp are all foolhardy, but wonder why they’re not all getting sick. They look out in amazement as camp 2 ride their bikes without helmets, drink milk, and (oh my God) touch public faucets with their bare hands. Strangely enough, camp one members keep getting sick even while wearing latex gloves and face masks, while those healthy camp 2 members cough and sneeze and then hug each other.

Now, this is not to say that camp two members are going around picking up dog turds with their bare hands. No, this they will not do. It’s just too gross. Nor will they .romp through a hospital ward filled with patients suffering from ebola hemorrhagic fever. Camp two understands this is a belief driven reality, but that they are in the beginning throes of the Remembered Self and so they take small steps so as not to overwhelm themselves and fall back into camp one of the Forgotten Self. So, my suggestion is this: if you’ve noticed that the world you live in is becoming increasingly dangerous; if you’ve installed high-end alarm systems in your homes; if you festoon your children with helmets, shin guards, knee guards, elbow guards and mouth guards before you send them out the door, it is to your beliefs you must turn. Your beliefs form your reality. You can create in fear or you can create in freedom. The choice has always been ours.
Bill Marshall
What? Me Worry!!
Remember Alfred E. Neuman from Mad Magazine? His famous words seem to have ingrained themselves into our collective psyches. In session 1393 Elias had this to say about worry:
ELIAS: Yes. Your attention is not present. And you project in association with the largest word, which is one of the smallest words, the “if.” What if, what if, what if. Once you begin to move into what if, what if, what if, your attention is occupied very much in the future, attempting to solve dilemmas that have not occurred, in anticipation of dilemmas which are not present and have not occurred.
Now; what are you creating and DOING in that action? In that projection, you are actually reinforcing an expression of energy outwardly to CREATE the dilemmas that you anticipate.


I think Alfred E. Neuman had an insight that we might consider incorporating ourselves, for as Elias has pointed out, worry throws us right out of the NOW and lands us on our collective asses in the future. And where is the future created? In the NOW. How can we create in the now if our attention is focused in the future? We can’t!

I’ve noticed, and you have also, that our news programs actually begin some of their segments with, “Should We Be Worried?” This morning (9/22/06) on the CBS morning show they had a bit on the “dangers” of not washing your hands often enough and then proceeded to demonstrate how to do it in a public place. First you get the paper towels and tuck them under your arm. By doing this you don’t have to touch the 'filth infested' dispenser with your clean hands after washing them. Of course they didn’t mention cleaning your dirty armpit before stuffing the paper towels there. Then you wash your hands vigorously for twenty seconds under hot water and avoid anti-bacterial soap. Anti-bacterial soap, we are told, can create drug resistant strains of bacteria. OK, you’re done washing your hands, but you don’t want to turn off the filth infested faucet with them because that would also defeat the purpose of washing in the first place. You bend over and somehow use your elbow to turn it off, or, grab the paper towel under your arm and use that.

Come on! As the Kit Kat candy commercial says, “Gimme a Break!” All of this gloom and doom reporting seems to be dividing us all into two camps. The first is the camp
of the fearful; those who live their lives in defense mode all the time. The second camp is comprised of those who have been so bombarded by all this victimization reporting that they have chosen not to believe any of it. I remember seeing a report on the harmful effects of milk. Eureka!!!! Milk?

The first camp has been slowly withdrawing from life, while the second camp, tired of feeling the victim of everything in their environment, has finally begun to engage life. The first camp has become the collective “Bubble Boy” of Seinfeld fame, while the second camp dances freely around the first camp. The first camp, of course, thinks the members of the second camp are all foolhardy, but wonder why they’re not all getting sick. They look out in amazement as camp 2 ride their bikes without helmets, drink milk, and (oh my God) touch public faucets with their bare hands. Strangely enough, camp one members keep getting sick even while wearing latex gloves and face masks, while those healthy camp 2 members cough and sneeze and then hug each other.

Now, this is not to say that camp two members are going around picking up dog turds with their bare hands. No, this they will not do. It’s just too gross. Nor will they .romp through a hospital ward filled with patients suffering from ebola hemorrhagic fever. Camp two understands this is a belief driven reality, but that they are in the beginning throes of the Remembered Self and so they take small steps so as not to overwhelm themselves and fall back into camp one of the Forgotten Self. So, my suggestion is this: if you’ve noticed that the world you live in is becoming increasingly dangerous; if you’ve installed high-end alarm systems in your homes; if you festoon your children with helmets, shin guards, knee guards, elbow guards and mouth guards before you send them out the door, it is to your beliefs you must turn. Your beliefs form your reality. You can create in fear or you can create in freedom. The choice has always been ours.
Bill Marshall
HEALTH
I am a two needle a day news junkie. I get the light news in the a.m. and the heavy-duty stuff in the p.m. A few years ago the anchor for CBS Evening News introduced a short piece about how scientists had made a connection between male pattern baldness and heart disease. I thought to myself, “My God, they have just killed an untold number of bald men.” Why were they killed? For the same reason voodoo works its magic on those that believe in it. There are enough men who believe so strongly in the power of science that such a news piece acts strongly through the power of suggestion.

Deaths per 100,000 population due to lung cancer are on the decline (except for American women). Many believe that the decline is due to fewer Americans smoking and better treatment modalities for the illness. However, immediately after the US Surgeon General’s warning appeared on cigarette packs in 1966, the rate of deaths due to lung cancer shot up. Now, forty years later, many of us are so conditioned to the advertising about the risks of smoking that the habit is never initiated, and those that have taken up smoking are quitting in droves. Could it be that the number of lung cancer deaths per 100,000 of the general population (not the smoking population) is dropping because of the belief that by not smoking we have developed some immunity to lung cancer? Many are surprised when someone who never smoked dies of lung cancer Steve Reeve’s wife is a case in point. We are told that if we quit smoking our lungs will repair themselves within a few years. Could it be that the quitters believe that they have earned a degree of immunity once they get past the belief that there is a three-year lung-healing process? Science tells us virtually nothing about the impact of our belief system on our health because they believe the psyche is a product of matter, and yet they admit to the reality of the placebo effect. They know that human chemistry changes based on our emotional state, but continue to say that illnesses such as depression are ‘caused’ by a problem with our blood chemistry. They don’t say what is being proposed here; that the change in blood chemistry arises simultaneously with the depression. Maybe it’s time we begin to understand that the depression and the change in brain chemistry are objective manifestations of an inner subjective state. Our illness may be created as a means of communication.

Seth tells us that what we believe about smoking is more important in terms of its impact on our health than the smoking itself. In Sweden, 22% of the male population over the age of fifteen are smokers, and the death rate from lung cancer is 161.4 per 100,000 male smokers. In Israel, 45% of males smoke and yet their death rate per 100,000 male smokers is only 84.7, half the rate of that in Sweden. In Japan, a whopping 59% of males smoke compared to 28% of American males, and yet Japan’s death rate is a low 81 per 100,000 smoking males compared to the U.S rate of 306. The data is similar for females in the U.S. Twenty-three percent of females over the age of fifteen smokes, and the death rate is 157 per 100,000 female smokers. In Spain the percentage of female smokers is higher than that in the U.S., 25%, and yet Spain’s death rate is only 21.6 per 100,000 female smokers.

This gets even more puzzling, or does it? In every developed country the death rates for male smokers is two to three times higher than it is for females, except in Japan, where the death rate to lung cancer for female smokers is higher than for Japanese smoking men. Why are death rates the same for Israeli and Japanese men, but for women the rate is twice as high in Japan? To get an answer in The Forgotten Self’s world our scientists might do studies on variables such as food intake, water content and hundreds of other daily variables except the psychological differences (belief systems) between oriental and occidental women who smoke, which would be a Remembered Self’s investigation. In a world where the predominant idea is that matter creates psyche, is it any wonder we get so much conflicting data as to the cause of things? For now, however, I recommend that if you smoke, keep to the company line and try to quit, but think about how your beliefs drive you and more importantly just try to understand the communication the illness brings.

Our bodies are magnificently constructed in such a way that it will respond to whatever we believe about it. The body has its own consciousness, but is exquisitely sensitive to our own subjective states. The evidence, however, seems to indicate just the opposite. The evidence of one of the central ideas of our time, that of scientific method, tells us that we are vulnerable to a Pandora's Box worth of invaders. We must be forever vigilant- the theory goes - lest some nasty microbe establishes a beachhead, or one of our healthy cells decides to mutate and turn against us. When I believe that consciousness is a by-product of matter it is a small leap of faith to believe that I am vulnerable to just about everything. And since I create what I believe, the evidence that confirms my beliefs will appear in abundance. Through the agency of free will many believe in our vulnerability and so we are vulnerable.

I realize I’m treading on sacred ground here, but our belief in our body’s inability to stay healthy has gotten so extreme that some women are sacrificing their breasts before any evidence of cancer appears, based solely upon a strong family history of breast cancer. Beliefs that deeply seeded are what required my legal disclaimer. Our physicians, as well-intentioned as they are, scoff at the practices of voodoo witch doctors and yet routinely ask us to sacrifice our breasts, reproductive organs, prostate glands, legs, thyroid's, hearts, lungs. Our response to this is that we would die if they were not removed, and we are right. We would die, but is it always by choice and it is never before we are finished. It only appears so.

Changing our understanding of who we are is going to take time, maybe even generations. The result, however, might be a future of high-tech medicine and self healing. When one of us does come down with an illness for the sake of the experience or because we were not listening to ourselves, we might seek the help of a healer who is an expert in symbolism, while our traditional physician buys us some time. We will seek through our own inner wisdom a connection between the ailment and an inner psychic dynamic that we failed to listen to. We will no longer be victims and illness and healing will be understood as a self-creation.

Bill Marshall