13 August 2008
I Kind of Create My Own Reality
Not for a minute do I
believe that I create my own reality, and not for a minute do I believe that I
don’t. I’m caught somewhere in the middle. I’m at the “I kind of create my own
reality” stage.
The idea that I create my own reality is both concept and fact. On the one
hand, I know it’s true, and on the other hand, I don’t totally believe it. I’ve
experienced knowing that I create all of my reality when I had the “out”-of
body. And yet, I haven’t been able to bring that level of knowing to my daily,
waking life. I try, but it’s tough. The reason that it’s tough is that I, like
so many people, have strong associations with being a small body in a great,
big world. Furthermore, there are some problems with the phrase “You create
your own reality” in general.
Take the word “create” for instance. Most people automatically associate that
term with their hands, their thoughts, and their speech. I’ll say, for example,
that, “I created room in my closet by getting rid of a bunch of old junk
that I had in there.” The association I make is that I used my hands to pick up
objects and move them to a new location. I use the word “created” to mean, “I
physically picked up those things in the closet and moved them.”
Or I’ll say that, “I created a new song today.” The association is that
I had an idea and then used my hands to type out the lyrics onto the computer.
If you create a product, you get an idea and then you might give
instructions to other people who then do things with their hands and to bring
together that product. Over and over again, the word “create” is associated
with a thought, spoken words, and the movement of your body and most often, but
not always, your hands.
Then you get these channeled authors who come along and say that you create
your own reality, and we’re all a little stumped. Because part of it rings
true. The idea dredges up some kind of long lost memory of something you can’t
quite put your mind around. At the same time, how can that possibly be accurate
that I create my own reality? Because the automatic association is that you
have to do something with your thoughts, words, or hands, and we all
know that we’re not out there yelling at the trees to come into being, or
thinking them into our backyards. I don’t make a mountain with my hands. And no
matter how hard I concentrate, I haven’t the foggiest idea how to create air.
As I sit in my living room, my hands, my thoughts, and my spoken words are not
creating the rug or the ottoman or the light fixture because I can sit here and
do nothing, think nothing, and say nothing, and the environment and those
objects will continue to exist around me. In fact, I’m tempted to say that I
don’t create any of it. I didn’t create the air, I didn’t create the apartment,
and I didn’t create the rug or the ottoman or the light fixture. Literally, I
did not use my hands to build any of these things. I did not instruct any other
person to do so either.
“Create” is a rascal of a word.
“You create your own reality” only makes sense if you redefine the words “you”
and “create.” If you define “you” as your body then the phrase makes no sense
whatsoever because you don’t create your reality by using your body to
construct it. Furthermore, if you limit the word “create” to only that narrow
definition of coming up with ideas, speaking, and constructing things through
the use of your body, then the phrase also makes no sense because you do not
create planets and solar systems that way, and those things are certainly part
of your reality.
“You” and “create” have to have expanded definitions for the phrase to make any
sense at all. Assuming the phrase is true, and I’m making that assumption, then
you as an identity must be in continuity with everything you see around you. In
other words, though you experience a kind of separation, you aren’t really
separate from anything. This has to be a fundamental identification otherwise
there’s no way you can have any effect on the reality you experience much less
create it. In order to be the causal force for your reality, you have to be
connected to it completely. If you don’t understand this then you’re just
uttering a phrase that hasn’t any real meaning.
And yet, this is a jump for most of us because we like to think of ourselves as
the body and the experiences of the body. You say, “I’m Jane Smith. I grew up
in Atlanta. I sell clothes for a living. I like to play tennis in my spare
time.” These are all stories about the experiences you have through the body
that you think make up your identity. You don’t think that you are
Atlanta and the clothes you sell and the store you sell them in. You don’t
think that you are the people who buy the clothes or the money you ring
up at the cash register. You don’t think that you are the tennis court
and the racket and the sunny day. To most people, their identity ends at their
skin.
We construct our ideas about ourselves in a manner that follows:
Body = Me.
Thoughts, ideas, desires, goals = Me.
Clothes = Mine, but not me.
Air = Not mine. Not me.
Relatives = Mine, but not me.
Job = Mine, but not me.
Car = Mine, but not me.
Government = Mine, but don’t want it to be mine. Not me.
Tree
down the street = Not mine. Not me.
Take a moment to recognize that these are stories that you’re telling yourself
and not necessarily facts. We allow ourselves to take ownership of some things,
and other things we hold at a distance, but in either case, we’re the one’s
declaring something to be one way or the other. This is merely a way of
structuring experience.
In order for “You create your own reality” to make sense, you have to expand
your story. In order to do that you first have to get over the idea that
expanding your identity is going to threaten who you are.
For example, for most people, it would be downright crazy for them to take
ownership of other people in their community and make those people part of
their identity. You might say, “I can control my own body, but I can’t control
others, so it makes no sense to say that another person is part of my identity.
I can’t realistically call them me.” True. Sort of. That’s the thing about expanding
your idea of what you are, you’re immediately faced with the concept of control.
But think about it. How much are you controlling anyway? You don’t control the
pumping of your blood through your body. You don’t control the patterns the
cells of your skin make. You don’t control the way the electrons in your body
spin. You’re just here, hanging out with all of that, taking it for granted.
Your expanded identity can be just as fluid.
You can take it for granted that even though you don’t control all of
the elements outside your body (including people), that they’re part of your
identity and that they function just fine. You can see the entire
universe as your expanded body. You can. Whether you do so or not is your
choice.
Well, what’s the advantage of such an expansive identity? For starters, you
begin to understand how the phrase “You create your own reality” can be true.
If you are the entire reality you experience, if your identity doesn’t
really end at your skin, your mental relationship with everything begins to
make more sense. In illustration, if you think of something awful that happened
to you, you’ll probably begin to feel sick to your stomach or your shoulders
will tense or you’ll frown. There’s an immediate, direct relationship between
your thoughts and your body that’s obvious. This is one of the reasons you
identify yourself with the body, because you feel the effects of your
thoughts. You therefore make the assumption that the body is you. But there’s
plenty in your body that you don’t feel, and you still make the leap in logic
that the body is you. You can make that same leap with the physical universe
itself. You don’t have to actually feel all of the parts of it for it to be
part of what you are and to have you have an effect on it. You can begin to
notice the effect by noticing the connections between your ideas and what you experience.
That’s the proof you’re looking for that you are more than the body.
For example, I’ve been keeping track of anomalies for a number of years now,
and if you do this you will have plenty of examples of how your ideas are
connected to what you experience. When we first moved to our apartment, I was
looking down the street and I thought, “Man, this would be the quaintest place
on the planet if there weren’t any electrical lines.” Six months later, they
took down the electrical lines (and it is now the quaintest place on the planet).
This stuff happens all the time. For about a year, every time I’d walk to the
grocery store, I’d pass this one restaurant and think, “They would do more
business if they had even one vegetarian thing on the menu.” They put vegetarian
entrées on the menu. Or when we had a bunch of vacancies all over town, I
thought, “What this town needs is a few galleries to class it up.” Guess what
went into the vacant spaces? You guessed it.
You might think, “You can’t honestly suppose that your thoughts were causing
those events.” That’s true if I’m just a body. Then that would be ridiculous. But
if I’m more, if what I see around me is really imagery that’s part of what I
am, then these kinds of connections between your everyday thoughts and events
begins to make more sense.
In other words, if the entire, physical universe is you then the thoughts you
think also have an effect on that expanded body. This is how “You create your
own reality” is not only possible but actually works. Because you are in
continuity with all of it, and what you choose to think about and believe has
an effect.
This brings me to the word “create.” Create is such a loaded term with so many
preconceived notions of what it means that I’ve been toying with some substitutes
like “cause” or “focus” or “idea.” So you could read the phrase as:
You cause your own reality, or;
You focus your own reality, or;
You idea your own reality.
If you’re always in unity with the whole of the universe, then what you choose
to focus on has the effect of causing certain events in your experience. This
sort of causal idea is easier for me to understand than using the word “create”
even though in the larger sense that term may be more accurate. However, from a
physical perspective we normally think we create things with our bodies.
So I need a different term, one that allows me to see the connection but let go of control. Creating my own reality is easier for me to understand if I have this expanded
identity of being everything and everyone I experience, and then I trigger
events through the ideas I choose to focus on. That makes some sense to me.
In other words, I can see that I’m creating my own reality if I am that entire
reality in the first place. Then there’s a relationship between my thoughts,
ideas and intents and everything I experience. Whereas, if I’m a separate
entity then I’m stuck because how can this separate entity be creating
everything around it? It can’t. There has to be a deeper, more fundamental
connection and construction to the individual itself. That’s my thinking, in
any case.
So, for the present, I’m trying to look around me and say, “Okay, I’m not just
this body, but I’m also the computer and the book shelf and the house next door
and so on.” I’m trying to expand my identity to include the whole, taking it on
faith that this is going to lead to some pretty interesting experiences. In
doing so, I’m steadily leading myself out of “I kind of create my own reality” to
“I create my own reality.” We’ll see what happens.
Samantha Standish is a writer and a former intellectual property and corporate law lawyer. She received her B.A. in history with honors, and her B.A. in Spanish with honors, in 1989 from the University of California, Santa Barbara and went on to get her law degree Cum Laude from the University of Maine School of Law. In her legal career, Samantha worked in government and the private sector, most notably in the financial planning and software industry. In her personal life, she’s been married for twenty years and has a fifteen year-old home schooled son. Samantha resigned from the bar in 2005 and has devoted herself to bridge writing (making complex ideas about space/time easy to understand for the average reader) ever since, focusing mostly on self-help articles for artists and writing bridge books on the side. In her words, “The first forty years of my life were fact finding; the next forty years are about applying, expanding and exploring what I’ve learned.” Her books can be found at samanthastandish.com. Samantha’s NWV blog is titled The Magical Life.