|
|
Browse by Tags
All Tags » outer ego » inner ego (RSS)
-
July 19, 2008, 4:38 PM.
Participants: Joanne, Paul, Ursula, Caryn, Tom, Mike, Cat, George, Bob, Joyce, Frieda (Pennsylvania), Eric (Pennsylvania), and Will (California).
Newsflash: We officially changed the name of our Rose Potluck Dinners! Now that we have a better sense of Rose’s direction and style, it seemed appropriate to resurrect the name ...
-
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your latest summary. ''The plot thickens'' a bit, and Seth also gives four basic practices in which to directly test out the waters.
I can't stress how important it is to DO these practices for a period of time. Seth is less prescriptive about the particulars, but we're leading up to the core axiom of ''you get what you ...
-
John Skingley: I'm thinking more than ever that our ongoing discussion about the 'parts' of ourselves is really boiling down to semantics. As soon as we start to think of ourselves in this way, the problem of exactly where the dividing lines are becomes a point of discussion, when, of course, the lines are completely arbitary in the first ...
-
Hi Paul,
I'm thinking more than ever that our ongoing discussion about the 'parts' of ourselves is really boiling down to semantics. As soon as we start to think of ourselves in this way, the problem of exactly where the dividing lines are becomes a point of discussion, when, of course, the lines are completely arbitary in the first place. My car ...
-
John Skingley: Paul M. Helfrich:
After 51 years in this physical focus, I can find no single causal element in my awareness, not my beliefs, my thoughts, feelings, emotions, expectations, dreams, impressions, impulses, body, DNA, genes, and on and on. TOGETHER, these elements conspire to create only the Framework 1 portions of my experience. As ...
-
Hi All,
I wanted to continue to explore something brought up in Joseph's previous topic before it got hijacked by a dyed in the wool Sethian fundamentalist who lost the privilege of posting on NWV yesterday.
Some of us were discussing Seth's ontology or nature of being and I was pleased to find the opportunity to post a classic piece of the ...
-
Joe T:Hello, everyone,Here’s a quote from my post in the topic “YWSCYR” on 10-06-06, which I would consider to be “semi-automatic” writing. My point is that our egos are part of the spectrum of our whole selves, not that our whole selves are separate from our egos. I think my analogy of the “spectrum of self” would be on par with Elias’ ...
|
|
|